🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are observing intently to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing group of countries are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that phones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' youth". The policy is expected to be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged lawmakers to enact a law raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a advisory motion calling for a ban for minors without guardian approval is given. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a good starting point," said a leading MEP behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in robust data".

Last year, interest grew behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Charities have voiced warnings. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after viewing dangerous platform posts suggests that a strict age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to create tools that are secure and age appropriate for children," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, legislation is mostly unfolding at the regional level due to country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule capping teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and calls from certain individuals to mimic Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, additional states are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies strike a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

As this worldwide conversation unfolds, the steps of Australia and several other countries indicate that governments internationally are less and less content to wait for the industry to self-regulate.